I assume they are around somewhere but I cannot find them.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

That looks like old data.

_________________
A good system naturally covers all corner cases without further effort.

Thanks, but that link shows no results. Surely they are out by now. The European congress and the WAGC had them out pretty quickly.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

results for yesterday's open round 1 are up now, as well as last night's ing(namt)

Congress results are often a bit slow. If I remember correctly from last year, the first round was especially late, and each subsequent round was faster. But who knows if that pattern would repeat.

_________________
Occupy Babel!

OK. I see them now. Is the tournamnet not a McMahon pairing? There is no column on that page for McMahon score or SOS so it is not possible to know who is leading.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

I'm sure it is, but that data probably hasn't been handed to the webmaster yet

So far Myungwan Kim is leading

While this doesn't make your question entirely uninteresting, the US Open is often won by a player who goes 6-0.

_________________
Occupy Babel!

It wasn't just first place I was interested in. I think most people have a pretty good idea who that will be.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

last year's results page didn't list the McMahon bands either, so I don't know if that data will be available to us.

I was just looking at the results so far and noticed that HKA is not playing in the main event. I have never known him to miss a congress. What's going on?

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

really?! I hadn't noticed. that is odd.

...but he's playing in the Ing (or namt, or naim, or whatever we're calling it these days)

I just looked at the results page. The results for round 6 are still not there, almost 36 hours after the games are finished. I seem to remember this happening in the past. Why is it that the AGA is so bad at keeping these pages up to date? The European Congress results were us very quickly.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

Round six still isn't up...would be nice to get it posted.

Yes, I'd like to know what place I ended up in the 1d bracket... I know it wasn't 1, 2, or 3...

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Full results are up, but I don't think SOS based rankings appear year. http://usgo.org/tournaments/crosstab/band-matrix/82

_________________
Occupy Babel!

Macmahon and SOS are not listed since I do not get that data in the xml files I receive for the crosstabs.

Normally round 6 is late due to people packing up and meetings in the afternoon on Saturday. Its one of those very busy days for people running different parts of congress.

This year was slower in getting data due to a new program being used and not getting the pairings/results until late at night.

_________________
Decisions are made by those who show up.
and possibly those willing to attend secret meetings in ancient basements

That really is unsatisfactory. Something needs to be done before next year. Imagine publishing all baseball results together, with no indication of whether each team is major league, from the minors, or a high school team. It would give no indication of the relative positions and strengths of each team.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

Probably everyone participating in the thread knows this, but for the sake of anyone wandering in, let me just note that tournament grids with SOS were published in at least 2007-2009.

Now a question: does the new program being used make it more difficult to publish this information?

_________________
Occupy Babel!