It is currently Tue Sep 02, 2025 7:54 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Pro memories
Post #1 Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:57 am 
Oza

Posts: 3724
Liked others: 20
Was liked: 4672
Regular readers will recall that we (GoGoD) have often mentioned discrepancies between game records. Internet and printed versions often differ, especially in China, but Korea has quite a few cases, too. very old games often suffer from copying errors. One rather irritating class is games that differ because the two players recorded the game from memory, but pro memories are frankly not quite as good as many adoring fans like to believe. There have been extensive problems in this regard in games played in the many goodwill exchanges between Japan and China. In this case there may not just be very different moves but a totally different result.

But I came across a rather unusual case today thanks to T Mark's eagle eye. Whenever we get new sources, he checks them carefully against our current record. This gives us many updates (extra moves, fuller date, etc) and also the chance to catch the odd error. The one he spotted today was unusual because it was in Japan (normally very reliable with printed records) and the two versions both had 111 moves, but also the two versions differed in orientation, giving a clue to what may have happened.

It was a game between Fujisawa Hideyuki and Hashimoto Shoji in an East-West Japan match. The records end in 111 moves. The Nihon Ki-in source gives the game from Fujisawa's point of view and includes a pair of moves missing from the other version. The Kansai Ki-in source gives the game from the point of view of their man, Hashimoto. It also has a pair of moves missing from the other source.

It seems a reasonable inference, from the different orientations, that the game records possibly came from the players themselves, recorded from memory afterwards (and nothing unsual in that). It also seems unlikely that the two mutually missing exchanges were invented. More likely they were just forgotten, so that the true record (assuming no other errors) should have had 113 moves.


This post by John Fairbairn was liked by: gasana
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Pro memories
Post #2 Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:57 am 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 124
Location: still above sea level: http://bit.ly/eQYULx
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 8
Rank: 3d EGF
GD Posts: 1700
John Fairbairn wrote:
(...)
The records end in 111 moves.
The Nihon Ki-in source gives the game from Fujisawa's point of view and includes a pair of moves missing from the other version. The Kansai Ki-in source gives the game from the point of view of their man, Hashimoto. It also has a pair of moves missing from the other source.

It seems a reasonable inference, from the different orientations, that the game records possibly came from the players themselves, recorded from memory afterwards (and nothing unsual in that). It also seems unlikely that the two mutually missing exchanges were invented. More likely they were just forgotten, so that the true record (assuming no other errors) should have had 113 moves.


'The other source'? Is that a 3rd, until now 'official' record?

Should the true record have then 115 moves? (111 + 2 forgotten move pairs)
Where these moves (both) probes?

_________________
Greetings,
Tommie

3dan EGF (AGA no 13477) || Tommie on KGS: 'June'|| DGS: 'Zhi Laohu' 纸老虎 = 'paper tiger' || Senseis : http://senseis.xmp.net/?tderz ||
ENFP (MBTI) - 'Find your own style within the Fundamentals of Go! '

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Pro memories
Post #3 Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:19 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2011
Location: Groningen, NL
Liked others: 202
Was liked: 1087
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Tommie wrote:
'The other source'? Is that a 3rd, until now 'official' record?

Should the true record have then 115 moves? (111 + 2 forgotten move pairs)
Where these moves (both) probes?


John is referring back to the Nihon Ki-in source.

Both the NK and the KK record have 111 moves. The actual game was 113 moves. Both records therefore omit two moves, but they do not omit the same moves.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Pro memories
Post #4 Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:46 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Tommie wrote:
John Fairbairn wrote:
(...)
The records end in 111 moves.
The Nihon Ki-in source gives the game from Fujisawa's point of view and includes a pair of moves missing from the other version. The Kansai Ki-in source gives the game from the point of view of their man, Hashimoto. It also has a pair of moves missing from the other source.

It seems a reasonable inference, from the different orientations, that the game records possibly came from the players themselves, recorded from memory afterwards (and nothing unsual in that). It also seems unlikely that the two mutually missing exchanges were invented. More likely they were just forgotten, so that the true record (assuming no other errors) should have had 113 moves.


'The other source'? Is that a 3rd, until now 'official' record?

Should the true record have then 115 moves? (111 + 2 forgotten move pairs)
Where these moves (both) probes?


This reminds me of a riddle my great uncle loved:

Two ducks in front of two ducks, two ducks behind two ducks, two ducks between two ducks. How many ducks?

:)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group