Life In 19x19 http://prod.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
Why only after two black moves is white dead? http://prod.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=12220 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | paullik [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 8:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
I was reading about ko, and ko threats at Sensei's Library and I found this diagram: ![]() If I take it in isolation and consider this paragraph: Quote: In this diagram black can play at a. White must respond at b. If white neglects to respond black will kill all the white stones by playing at b himself. Well, isn't white already dead? Since he's surrounded and cannot make eyes? Why should black play at a and b in order to consider white dead? Or is this just for illustration purposes for the entire article? Original article: http://senseis.xmp.net/?Ko |
Author: | leichtloeslich [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
its a simple seki |
Author: | paullik [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
I cannot see it... |
Author: | Abyssinica [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 9:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
Even though white has no eyes, when the liberties on the outside get filled, black cannot fill in the liberties on the inside to capture white without making it so that white will be able to live. Simple example: In order for white to capture black, white would have to play a move inside. Yet if white plays a move here, it creates a straight 4 shape, black captures, and then black has the 4 space eye shape to live with. If black wants to capture white well then that's self-atari and he dies. |
Author: | xed_over [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 10:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
paullik wrote: I cannot see it... well then... let's play it out... Black makes the ko threat. If White ignores the threat to win the ko (elsewhere on the board, and not shown), then black plays again to kill the white stones. Now there is no way for white to make two eyes here. Black will just continue to fill in all the liberties until he can capture all of white's stones. However, if White responds to the threat, white is alive in seki. Once all the outside liberties are filled, neither side want to play at a or b. Seki. If black plays at a or b, then white can live with territory. If white plays at a or b, then black can capture all of whites stones for lots of territory. |
Author: | paullik [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 10:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
xed_over wrote: well then... let's play it out... [...] However, if White responds to the threat, white is alive in seki. Ok, so the seki is after white responds to the threat, that makes more sense. Thanks for the clarifications. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 10:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
One more point about this position. If White plays ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | paullik [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
Bill Spight wrote: One more point about this position. If White plays ![]() ![]() ![]() Since they are inside white's territory, right? |
Author: | skydyr [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
paullik wrote: Bill Spight wrote: One more point about this position. If White plays ![]() ![]() ![]() Since they are inside white's territory, right? Yes, in a sense, but do you understand why it's white's territory now and not before? |
Author: | paullik [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
skydyr wrote: paullik wrote: Since they are inside white's territory, right? Yes, in a sense, but do you understand why it's white's territory now and not before? Because it's only now that the ![]() |
Author: | skydyr [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
paullik wrote: skydyr wrote: paullik wrote: Since they are inside white's territory, right? Yes, in a sense, but do you understand why it's white's territory now and not before? Because it's only now that the ![]() Well... In this diagram, black's three stones are also surrounded, but they're alive in seki. So what's the difference between the this one and the following that makes it different? |
Author: | paullik [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
skydyr wrote: Well... In this diagram, black's three stones are also surrounded, but they're alive in seki. So what's the difference between the this one and the following that makes it different? The number of liberties of the white stones, which in fact lead to seki or to killing the three black stones. |
Author: | skydyr [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 2:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
paullik wrote: skydyr wrote: Well... In this diagram, black's three stones are also surrounded, but they're alive in seki. So what's the difference between the this one and the following that makes it different? The number of liberties of the white stones, which in fact lead to seki or to killing the three black stones. Well, if black plays here: Isn't the number of liberties the same as before? White has 5 liberties in this and the other diagram. |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
http://senseis.xmp.net/?DeadEyeshapes |
Author: | gowan [ Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
In this diagram White has three "outside" liberties so white can play at a and b (if necessary) so in the end the shape will be The empty points inside White's group make four in a line which is alive. If Black plays first as in the next diagram, White lives in seki, as do the three surrounded black stones. So in either case, White lives. In one case White gets points, in the other no points, but White lives in both cases. |
Author: | paullik [ Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Why only after two black moves is white dead? |
gowan wrote: So in either case, White lives. In one case White gets points, in the other no points, but White lives in both cases. I wouldn't have thought about this, since I was still looking at the problem from the point where black dies or not, not considering the fact that white remains alive. |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Aug 27, 2015 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Off topic: Quote: I was still looking at... not considering... Hi Paul,Isn't it nice that Go teaches us... |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |