Life In 19x19 http://prod.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol http://prod.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1035 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | deja [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
Kong Jie won the Fujitsu Cup, beating Lee Sedol by 12.5 points. Wow! More info and game record here - http://justplaygo.com/ |
Author: | oren [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
I don't know about demolishing but here is the game. |
Author: | gowan [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
I guess a lot of people think Black has a big lead after move 13 so this game is a good example of how to handle a loose moyo when you have some solid territory. |
Author: | Marcus [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
Black's opening is interesting. I'm now experimenting with this pseudo Kobayashi/Micro Chinese fusion kind of thing in my own games ... lots of fun. |
Author: | fwiffo [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
Yes, I noticed. ![]() |
Author: | Marcus [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
fwiffo wrote: Yes, I noticed. ![]() Your current move has me brain-tied. You'll have to wait for my next move, it might take a while. |
Author: | Joaz Banbeck [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it. |
Author: | oren [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
Joaz Banbeck wrote: Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it. It's becoming fairly common. I have a book from Japan that covers it for a little bit. The idea is fairly similar to the low Chinese. http://senseis.xmp.net/?MicroChinese |
Author: | LokBuddha [ Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
I don't know about demolishing either, but it was an interesting game. Lee sedol will remember this. ahahahahah |
Author: | John Fairbairn [ Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
Quote: Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it. It is discussed extensively in New In Go, items 68, 70 amd 71. |
Author: | Bill Spight [ Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol |
Joaz Banbeck wrote: Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it. [sgf-full](;SZ[19]FF[3] PW[Honinbo Doetsu] PB[Yasui Sanchi] EV[Castle Game] DT[1649-03-29 (Keian 2 II 17)] PC[Edo Castle] KM[0] RE[B+11 {moves beyond 170 not known}] US[GoGoD95] ;B[cp];W[qd];B[dc];W[pq];B[fq];W[ce];B[ch];W[hq];B[fo];W[lc];B[ic];W[hd] ;B[hc];W[fd];B[fc];W[od];B[ed];W[ee];B[gd];W[ff];B[ge];W[ei];B[ck];W[qn] ;B[lq];W[kp];B[lp];W[kn];B[ln];W[lo];B[mo];W[ko];B[oq];W[pp];B[mn];W[kq] ;B[or];W[pr];B[on];W[co];B[do];W[cn];B[bp];W[dn];B[dg];W[cc];B[ef];W[df] ;B[eg];W[fe];B[cb];W[fg];B[ek];W[eo];B[dp];W[fn];B[fh];W[gh];B[gi];W[fi] ;B[eh];W[hg];B[hh];W[gg];B[cf];W[dd];B[ec];W[de];B[bf];W[ci];B[bi];W[di] ;B[gj];W[bj];B[bh];W[fp];B[ep];W[go];B[gp];W[hp];B[fo];W[en];B[qm];W[rm] ;B[rl];W[pm];B[ql];W[pn];B[qi];W[oo];B[no];W[op];B[np];W[mr];B[lr];W[ns] ;B[ll];W[bb];B[bc];W[bd];B[cd];W[cj];B[bk];W[cc];B[qf];W[ac];B[fj];W[fp] ;B[pc];W[qc];B[mc];W[md];B[lb];W[kb];B[kc];W[ld];B[jb];W[mb];B[ka];W[nc] ;B[pe];W[pd];B[pl];W[fr];B[er];W[gq];B[eq];W[rn];B[nq];W[os];B[om];W[pg] ;B[qg];W[ph];B[pi];W[nh];B[oi];W[pf];B[qe];W[oe];B[oh];W[ng];B[rd];W[rc] ;B[re];W[qh];B[rh];W[rg];B[sg];W[ni];B[nj];W[mj];B[mk];W[lj];B[je];W[kf] ;B[ke];W[ii];B[jf];W[jg];B[lf];W[kg];B[le];W[kl];B[kk];W[lk];B[ml];W[lm] ;B[mm];W[km] )[/sgf-full] I don't know about theory, but the practice is hoary. ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |