Life In 19x19 http://prod.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) http://prod.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=966 |
Page 1 of 5 |
Author: | Kie [ Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Have a nice game!
|
Author: | k43r [ Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Hi, as I am now 1k, I'll take black with 0.5 komi. Hafe a nice game! I've been playing actively until February 2010. In April i came to the forum, and for two weeks I am back to play. I believe in go you have to be flexible, so I can play all kinds of games. While I am playing with someone weaker I don't focus on deciding the flow of the game -I'd rather punish mistakes and sub-optimal moves. As i was not playing for several months i don't feel comfortable with josekis - I did forget at least half of them. So let's begin |
Author: | Kie [ Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
I'm feeling out of shape today so I'll just play my regular move here and see what black has in store. |
Author: | Chew Terr [ Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Kie: Is there a reason you picked that corner instead of the top left? To kyu eyes, the top left seems to leave better approaches for you. |
Author: | k43r [ Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | #3 |
I like to play two 3-4 points as in 99% of games i can play mini-chinese of kobayashi fuseki. I think i'll go with mini-chinese as I am not sure about distant low approach joseki. |
Author: | Kie [ Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Chew Terr wrote: Kie: Is there a reason you picked that corner instead of the top left? To kyu eyes, the top left seems to leave better approaches for you. It becomes clear in my next move. Stay tuned. |
Author: | Kie [ Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
As mentioned in my earlier games, I like to counter the kobayashi and chinese openings, and playing a hoshi in the not-diagonal corner (which was white's first move) allows me to always be able to do this. As we can see here, he no longer has that option. If you play regularly you may end up with this:
Which is the mini-chinese shape at the left. Starting in top-left has the same problem:
With "problem" I don't mean that it's bad for white, this opening is quite popular among professionals and personally I like it quite a bit myself. But I usually try to avoid the most standard-openings when playing against players with lower ratings so that they will have less chances to rely on pro-level moves in the opening. The more they have to think for themselves, the better it is for me. Against a 9d, I would be quite happy to trail along some standard-pro-pattern. |
Author: | k43r [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
I remember that pros tend to play shimari in UL, or kakari in UR in this situation. I play R6 in 65% and E4 in 35% (dpending on mood). This time i chooose R6 because i've written so in last post |
Author: | Kie [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Well, might as well prevent the kobayashi. I've studied most of the normal variations on this move so I feel confident. |
Author: | k43r [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 3:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Just keeping simple. If he blocks at P4 then i get sente to play E4, if he blocks at R5 I won't be sad too. |
Author: | Kie [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
I suggest this sequence: (Either way, I will keep move ![]()
I will approach some corner after, the kobayashi was prevented and the result should be ok for both at this point. |
Author: | k43r [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
And i agree, it's your move again. |
Author: | Kie [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
I just got some thickness so I'll approach the corner now without any fear. If he pincers, I'll conjure up some counterplan. |
Author: | k43r [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
First of all i tink he have chosen bad corner. There is nothing interesting here. This low stone also shows that he doesn't want anything big here. I'll let him settle here. I see two possibilities.I I'll be happy with both of them. First one makes his thickness useless and activates my stone at R6.
Second one, because his stone at p17 will suffer. I don't know wchich pincer will i choose.
|
Author: | Kie [ Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
I feel invited to play here, let's see what black has planned. Right now my main concern is points, since black took the lower corner it's important to not give black too much cash right now since he is wealthy already. With no komi, it's hard for white to relax. |
Author: | k43r [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Move 19 |
Click Here To Hide Diagram Code
First is good to bump - it secures corner, makes him harder to make eys and make him heavier.
It's dream.
I think white shoudl treat his initial kakari as a light stone and extend 3 spaces from it, than i will hane and he will secure with either stretch or 2-space extension. |
Author: | Kie [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Aiming at the aji and extension.
|
Author: | k43r [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Move 21 |
|
Author: | daniel_the_smith [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
Did k43r forget about r15? Pros always play r13 or r14 in my database. |
Author: | Aphelion [ Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 58. Kie (1d) vs. k43r (1k) |
I wonder, would this empty triangle be good here? |
Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |