Life In 19x19 http://prod.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
OGS Game review - 16k http://prod.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12612 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | TheStarker [ Thu Jan 14, 2016 7:52 am ] | ||
Post subject: | OGS Game review - 16k | ||
Hi everyone, Here's one of my latest game, I'd appreciate some comments on basic principles if you don't mind spending a few minutes on my game. Thanks in advance for your help, Martin
|
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi Martin, Were you B ? Assuming yes: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Up to here, 99% of your problems are basic shape problems (contact fight problems). This gives you an idea what to focus on. ( Not mentioned: when you ignored ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | skydyr [ Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k |
EdLee made many good points above, but there is one thing I'd want to add: There are a couple points, at ![]() ![]() At ![]() As for the second, at ![]() Don't worry about not knowing the joseki for the various pincers if you don't. Chances are your opponent doesn't know them well either, so as long as you stay flexible and read a bit you should be able to muddle through with something reasonable. |
Author: | TheStarker [ Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k |
Hi guys, thank you for the help, I will look into it! I keep practicing tsumegos but I guess I'll have to be patient before I see the benefits! Thanks again, Martin |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
TheStarker wrote: I keep practicing tsumegos but I guess I'll have to be patient before I see the benefits! Hi Martin,Tsumego is very good, of course; but in this case, there's very little overlap with the problems in post 2. |
Author: | TheStarker [ Sun Feb 21, 2016 10:22 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k | ||
Hi guys, Would you give some advices on this game, I really felt I couldn't get any space vs this player... ![]()
|
Author: | skydyr [ Sun Feb 21, 2016 12:25 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k | ||
Some thoughts: As one other thing to consider... how many groups did white have at the end? How about black?
|
Author: | TheStarker [ Tue Mar 29, 2016 2:16 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k | ||
Hi guys, I’d appreciate if you could give me a few hints on this game. I tried to “play big” but ended up losing by a large gap. I suppose at some points I haven’t played the most important moves. Thank you in advance for your help!
|
Author: | Schachus [ Tue Mar 29, 2016 4:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k |
The result in the lower left seems o be a complete fiasco for black to me. My Joseki knowledge is too imited to tell you whether ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi Martin, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() you should try your best to pressure ![]() see if you can kill it, or force W to make a ko for life, or force W to live in vote. ( You said you were practicing tsumego ?! ![]() |
Author: | TheStarker [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k |
Hi guys, Thank you for your help, I will think on it! Right now I'm in a losing streak... I developped the bad habit of not reading enough which puts me in bad situations. I suppose it's a shared issue: I play instantly without considering the whole board... ![]() |
Author: | EdLee [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi Martin, Good luck. ![]() |
Author: | TheStarker [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k |
Author: | TheStarker [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:28 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k | ||
Hello fellows, Here's another game I played, I felt I was close and would need your help to point out my main mistakes. I have spotted a few which were bad for me: ![]() ![]() :b121: till :b124: didn't use the influence built :b144: lost my group Best, Martin
|
Author: | Schachus [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k |
I really dont think that you have found the crucial points to name as mistakes. What I think is: ![]() ![]() EDIT: when writing this I didnt realize that w's group doesnt have 2 eyes yet(t17 seems to make a ko shape locally, but it can also still jump out, so you could surround it to force it to live and then go somewhere else). This makes the comment "loses sente" a little strange(as he did answer though I think he should rather jump out), but it remains true your move ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 144 is not a black move, and certainly losing your group happenend much later. e.g. as late as ![]() I didnt look any further than that. |
Author: | TheStarker [ Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k |
Hi Schachus, Thank you for the extensive advices. ![]() I'm trying to get away from "reading laziness" which still makes me play unnecessary moves making me lose Sente. ![]() Thanks again, Martin |
Author: | TheStarker [ Mon May 30, 2016 1:07 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: OGS Game review - 16k | ||
Hi guys, Here's a new game for which I would appreciate to have your comments.
|
Author: | EdLee [ Mon May 30, 2016 7:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
(Re: post 20, below.) |
Author: | EdLee [ Mon May 30, 2016 7:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hi Martin, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Let's go back. ![]() B can pressure W; it is W (not B) who should be under pressure and defending. If you kick W on ![]() ![]() then you jump to O4: continue to pressure W. ![]() W cannot link up ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This thinking and this exchange ![]() ![]() For one thing, you still have a weakness at R3. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() you didn't think about to cut off W and fight. Even if you want R16, you still block at Q17 first -- then, when W hanes at Q18, then you have a choice. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Here, you didn't think to cut off W with the hane at R9. W can just connect back (e.g. R8). ![]() ![]() ![]() Think about sente and gote. ![]() ![]() ![]() So ![]() ![]() You can live immediately with J19. Why not ?! |
Author: | EdLee [ Tue May 31, 2016 4:28 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Somehow the SGF-full method doesn't work on iOS 7.x (at least not for Safari and another browser): |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |