Life In 19x19 :: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted

Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

tj86430 wrote:

Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

your move dos not prevent D7 either.

tj86430 wrote:

Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

You're welcome. Once W is out, your 2 B stones are no longer cutting stones (see note at :b99:

A few thoughts:

:b39:

You might think about a move like J17 instead. The right side seems smaller than the top to me.

:b45:

I prefer approaching the lower left (C6), you have more support there. Maybe that's just style, though.

:b53:

I still prefer C6, or maybe F3 now. This slide is big, but can he afford to tennuki? A sequence like C6-K18-F3 seems better for black.

Why not :b75:

at A10? It seems to catch the stones without ko. Am I missing something?

:b129: H17 seems bigger.

216 moves in 10 minutes = less than 5.6 secs/move.

Author:	tj86430 [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:21 am ]
Post subject:	Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted
This is something I played recently. I was black, and I eventually won by 0,5 points. I was quite pleased with my play, but I'm sure there are plenty of mistakes waiting to be pointed out, so all comments are welcome.

Author:	EdLee [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:10 am ]
Post subject:
216 moves in 10 minutes = less than 5.6 secs/move. A few quick ideas:

Author:	tj86430 [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:21 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted
Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black?

Author:	lefuet [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:31 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted
tj86430 wrote: Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black? your move dos not prevent D7 either.

Author:	EdLee [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:37 am ]
Post subject:
tj86430 wrote: Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black? You're welcome. Once W is out, your 2 B stones are no longer cutting stones (see note at ). If your 2 B stones were important to you, you could've just connected at .

Life In 19x19 http://prod.lifein19x19.com/

Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted http://prod.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4285	Page 1 of 1

Author:	emeraldemon [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:16 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted
A few thoughts: You might think about a move like J17 instead. The right side seems smaller than the top to me. I prefer approaching the lower left (C6), you have more support there. Maybe that's just style, though. I still prefer C6, or maybe F3 now. This slide is big, but can he afford to tennuki? A sequence like C6-K18-F3 seems better for black. Why not at A10? It seems to catch the stones without ko. Am I missing something? :b129: H17 seems bigger.

Author:	tj86430 [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:27 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted
lefuet wrote: tj86430 wrote: Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black? your move dos not prevent D7 either. You are absolutely right. I totally misread it while playing, and didn't bother to read again afterwards.

Author:	tj86430 [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:29 am ]
Post subject:	Re:
EdLee wrote: tj86430 wrote: Thanks for the comments. How does your variation at move 89 (F7) work, cant white capture the two black stones with D7, which to me seems quite bad for black? You're welcome. Once W is out, your 2 B stones are no longer cutting stones (see note at ). Thanks again. I saw the note, but I thought that at that point white was "more" out than at 89.

Author:	tj86430 [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:30 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted
emeraldemon wrote: A few thoughts: You might think about a move like J17 instead. The right side seems smaller than the top to me. I prefer approaching the lower left (C6), you have more support there. Maybe that's just style, though. I still prefer C6, or maybe F3 now. This slide is big, but can he afford to tennuki? A sequence like C6-K18-F3 seems better for black. Why not at A10? It seems to catch the stones without ko. Am I missing something? :b129: H17 seems bigger. Thank you. As for B45, I thought I need to do something in the upper left before it develops to a big moyo.

Author:	tj86430 [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:32 am ]
Post subject:	Re:
I'll respond to this, too: EdLee wrote: 216 moves in 10 minutes = less than 5.6 secs/move. It's true that 10 mins games are awfully quick, but I seldom have time to play a long game, and I thought I rather post this than nothing.

Author:	Joaz Banbeck [ Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Peaceful, even, very close game. Comments wanted
At move 17, P10 is probably necessary. But then he is ahead of you. So if you keep pushing, he gets more out of it then you do. Move 19 should be at N9. Again, 21 should be at M9. 57 is not necessary. He can't cut: S16 and R15 are miai. You could play F4 or C6.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/