Life In 19x19 http://prod.lifein19x19.com/ |
|
6d by next week http://prod.lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=13075 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Jarmo [ Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:53 am ] |
Post subject: | 6d by next week |
Lofty goals hurt us when we don’t achieve them. My only goals related to Go are to play consistently and to try new ideas. This has led to slow and enjoyable improvement over some time. Something I am aiming at right now is to play for territory more often than I like. I came down the kyu ranks playing handicap games. As a result, I love giant, thick walls of stones. When I am pincered after approaching a star point, jumping into the corner and taking profit feels terrible to me. Because of this, I try to jump into the corner as much as possible. I believe that I have a weakness when it comes to dealing with my opponent’s large moyos. All comments are always appreciated. If anyone would like to play a game sometime, let me know. ![]() |
Author: | Jarmo [ Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
I don't have many thoughts on this game. I was a bit lost on on what to do with ![]() ![]() |
Author: | mitsun [ Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
Your invasion ![]() Connecting at ![]() There were several problems in the upper right corner:
After ![]() After ![]() B should at least see the net if not the ladder. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
Mistun, thank you for your comments. I was very fortunate in that corner and didn't deserve the result. I also missed the net. I should have played it even with a working ladder. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
I have not reviewed this game myself yet. Allergies have turned my eyes into sand. Everything felt random and I have never seen any of the patterns in the game before so prepare yourself for suboptimal play all around! |
Author: | Knotwilg [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 4:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
In this game you were the better fighter but you launched fights when you were ahead and this was not necessary. A better fighter would take advantage of the opportunity to fight himself back into the game. Full review: |
Author: | Jarmo [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
Thank you Knotwilg for the detailed review! I always like to think of myself as the kind of person who wouldn't start a fight that wasn't beneficial, but your comments in this game show that we are not always the best at judging ourselves. On Wednesday's I play a lot of handicap go. Perhaps I can blame the mindset during this game as Wednesday night residue? Your recommendation of ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Jarmo [ Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
This is a game with my good buddy Cacafogo. We usually play without time constraints and try out new and bad moves on each other. We usually discuss the game for about as long as the game took. In this game I felt like I got ahead in the beginning and played slack moves the rest of the game. We like to play out dream sequences a lot and often abort ideas after starting them. I believe I lost on move 138, although we both made lots of mistakes before that point. After that move is when I felt like I was going to lose. Any advice for either side is appreciated as he will be reading your guys' comments as well. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
I'm curious about alternatives to move ![]() |
Author: | Knotwilg [ Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
Hi, Here's a full review. Key points are 22 - leading to an unfavorable opening 39 - bad crosscut, which somewhat restores the balance 66 - which we both see as the first losing move (I made this comment already in my offline analysis when you added your reply here) 87 - a soft move by Black which allows you to reduce the gap and get chances in the endgame 132 - the second losing move; the edges are important in the endgame, but one shouldn't allow the opponent to form new territories at that stage 138 - the final losing move; the loss is increased to over 5 points 174 - closing comments Overall, both played a fairly patient game and sometimes too soft at that. Black grabbed his chance to trick White at 131, earning him a well deserved victory, but still White had his chances too. Not a bad game at all. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
Thanks again Knotwilg! Because of the lack of time limit on our games, we like to work on positional judgement. We aren't great at it, but we try to estimate the score a lot, which helps explain some overly slack moves. We both hate dealing with moyos and want to learn more about reduction moves, such as when to make a reduction move and when to passively respond to a reduction move. Your review contains many ideas that we didn't think of even in our after game discussion. I truly appreciate it. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Thu Apr 21, 2016 6:58 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week | ||
File.
|
Author: | Jarmo [ Thu Apr 21, 2016 6:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
I commented my thoughts during the game in the file. I have terrible playing habits. I frequently play moves that don't work that I believe my opponent will fall for. They often do, but when I play this way against a stronger player I fall apart. I want to try to play moves that I understand will work. I always blame handicap games for this bad habit. I probably need to change the way I play handicap games as well. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Sat Apr 30, 2016 11:17 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week | ||
File
|
Author: | Jarmo [ Sat Apr 30, 2016 11:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
My goal in this game is to play solid moves that I can understand. I want to play territorially to see if I can learn more about dealing with opponent moyos. I have noticed a bad habit in my games where I play strong looking moves but have not read out any continuations. They usually rely on my opponent making a mistake and I think I avoid these types of dishonest move in this game. I have commented my thoughts in the game and would appreciate any correction of bad thinking that I have. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Sat May 28, 2016 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
Comments are appreciated. Anything that rubs you the wrong way for either side. |
Author: | Magicwand [ Sat May 28, 2016 11:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
20: until you stop playing obvious mistakes as such you will never become 6dan. 26: why not take other stone in sente? that is called pillar stone. two moves hurt my eyes so much i stopped .. |
Author: | Jarmo [ Sun May 29, 2016 9:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
That is two tips more than anyone else. I appreciate the feedback Magicwand! I don't believe I will ever come anywhere close to to 6d. I became content with the game around 6k and any progress made past that point is just a byproduct of enjoying playing and thinking about go. ![]() |
Author: | gamesorry [ Sun May 29, 2016 2:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
Jarmo wrote: That is two tips more than anyone else. I appreciate the feedback Magicwand! I don't believe I will ever come anywhere close to to 6d. I became content with the game around 6k and any progress made past that point is just a byproduct of enjoying playing and thinking about go. ![]() So here's a tsumego problem for you: what can white do locally? |
Author: | Jarmo [ Sun May 29, 2016 9:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 6d by next week |
A ko? I thought I was going to get a ko in the game with my descent, but my reading was not good enough. I didn't consider his correct response. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |