It is currently Sat Sep 06, 2025 2:35 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #61 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:08 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 248
Liked others: 23
Was liked: 148
Rank: DGS 2 kyu
Universal go server handle: Polama
The missing concept here is 'Positional Judgement'

SmoothOper wrote:
reading is obviously so limited compared to the possibilities inherent in the game, and therefore even in reading you are making strategic assumptions


This implies to me, at least, that you consider positional judgment to be strategy. If I look at an atari of a key stone to save a group, and dismiss it as 'no, it escapes into too open an area, I won't have time' that's positional judgement. You seem to view that as strategy. To those of us disagreeing, though, it's more a part of reading: It was a local determination, it built on local intuition about what could be expected from tesuji here and how many moves could be expected before the group was captured. Reading isn't just a brute force resolution of a position to its very end, but also the reasoning around which lines can be pruned and reading to a point to make a judgement.

Or put another way, joseki discussions involve things like 'good for black: white has too much aji for the territory black gained'. It's positional judgement. Obviously, nobody read the joseki to all possible conclusions. To many of us, the strategic discussion would be whether it made sense for white to give up so much for influence on this board. The question of the local position is closer to reading, because it builds on reading likely local continuations. Beginners often view huge shimari as safe territory. Partially that's bad strategy, thinking they can make up for it elsewhere, partially it's bad reading: They can't visualize the ways an invasion could work.

Does that explain the disagreement? Positional Judgement is 100% necessary to play. If you say positional judgement is strategy, then yes, strategy is by far the most important part of the game. But if you view Positional Judgement as a third concept built up from both reading and strategy, the topic becomes something for discussion.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #62 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:15 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 1223
Liked others: 738
Was liked: 239
Rank: OGS 2d
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
SmoothOper wrote:
Sigh, evidently the mods here don't enforce rules about personal attacks tightly or consistently which would explain much about the functionality/dis-functionality of this particular forum. Maybe they think things like "I can tell you are a weak player, because I have superior reading ability" are par for the course.


My reading ability is telling me something else.


This post by illluck was liked by 3 people: Dusk Eagle, Phelan, Twitchy Go
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #63 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:44 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 946
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 41
Rank: IGS 5kyu
KGS: KoDream
IGS: SmoothOper
Polama wrote:
The missing concept here is 'Positional Judgement'

SmoothOper wrote:
reading is obviously so limited compared to the possibilities inherent in the game, and therefore even in reading you are making strategic assumptions


This implies to me, at least, that you consider positional judgment to be strategy. If I look at an atari of a key stone to save a group, and dismiss it as 'no, it escapes into too open an area, I won't have time' that's positional judgement. You seem to view that as strategy. To those of us disagreeing, though, it's more a part of reading: It was a local determination, it built on local intuition about what could be expected from tesuji here and how many moves could be expected before the group was captured. Reading isn't just a brute force resolution of a position to its very end, but also the reasoning around which lines can be pruned and reading to a point to make a judgement.

Or put another way, joseki discussions involve things like 'good for black: white has too much aji for the territory black gained'. It's positional judgement. Obviously, nobody read the joseki to all possible conclusions. To many of us, the strategic discussion would be whether it made sense for white to give up so much for influence on this board. The question of the local position is closer to reading, because it builds on reading likely local continuations. Beginners often view huge shimari as safe territory. Partially that's bad strategy, thinking they can make up for it elsewhere, partially it's bad reading: They can't visualize the ways an invasion could work.

Does that explain the disagreement? Positional Judgement is 100% necessary to play. If you say positional judgement is strategy, then yes, strategy is by far the most important part of the game. But if you view Positional Judgement as a third concept built up from both reading and strategy, the topic becomes something for discussion.


I think that local reading is also strategic decision, for example choosing a gote, sente, ko, thickness, sabaki, etc.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #64 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:04 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 248
Liked others: 23
Was liked: 148
Rank: DGS 2 kyu
Universal go server handle: Polama
SmoothOper wrote:
I think that local reading is also strategic decision, for example choosing a gote, sente, ko, thickness, sabaki, etc.


Yes. I agree with you that deciding whether it's better to live in gote or tenuki and accept a ko for life is a strategic decision.

You could say that always living in gote, because life > ko for life, is a strategy. I'd argue it's useful to just call that reading. They read the local outcome, then didn't consider any other information so made a tactically strong, but possibly strategically inferior choice.

The reasoning that leads to strong advocacy of reading ability is that whether you play thickly or lightly in a position can be less important than how you do it: That if it's strategically superior to play thickly, it'll often be better to play lightly and play lightly very well, then to play thickly but get tricked into still leaving important aji. You can see this in life or death, where even knowing that tenuki and ko was an option you could chose can require a fair amount of reading ability.

Personally, my strategy is stronger than my reading and they clearly both have value. I have to get more points than my opponent, because I'll negate the value of some of my position sooner or later by missing something important on the board.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #65 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:33 pm 
Lives in sente

Posts: 946
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 41
Rank: IGS 5kyu
KGS: KoDream
IGS: SmoothOper
Polama wrote:
SmoothOper wrote:
I think that local reading is also strategic decision, for example choosing a gote, sente, ko, thickness, sabaki, etc.


Yes. I agree with you that deciding whether it's better to live in gote or tenuki and accept a ko for life is a strategic decision.

You could say that always living in gote, because life > ko for life, is a strategy. I'd argue it's useful to just call that reading. They read the local outcome, then didn't consider any other information so made a tactically strong, but possibly strategically inferior choice.

The reasoning that leads to strong advocacy of reading ability is that whether you play thickly or lightly in a position can be less important than how you do it: That if it's strategically superior to play thickly, it'll often be better to play lightly and play lightly very well, then to play thickly but get tricked into still leaving important aji. You can see this in life or death, where even knowing that tenuki and ko was an option you could chose can require a fair amount of reading ability.

Personally, my strategy is stronger than my reading and they clearly both have value. I have to get more points than my opponent, because I'll negate the value of some of my position sooner or later by missing something important on the board.


I seldom capture as many stones as my opponent and sometimes they capture very many, even when I win, which I think is a defect, that I am trying to improve, though it is kind of odd to me that at my rank playing other people at my same rank winning marginally greater than 50% something like this would occur.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #66 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:00 pm 
Gosei

Posts: 1387
Liked others: 139
Was liked: 111
GD Posts: 209
KGS: Marcus316
SmoothOper wrote:
I seldom capture as many stones as my opponent and sometimes they capture very many, even when I win, which I think is a defect, that I am trying to improve, though it is kind of odd to me that at my rank playing other people at my same rank winning marginally greater than 50% something like this would occur.


This does not seem to be a defect. Maybe I've misunderstood what you mean, but it sounds like you think that winning while not capturing as many stones as your opponent does is a problem, and that you should be capturing at least as many stones as your opponent. Is this what you meant? Because if so I think you may have a fundamental misunderstanding of the game.

Because capturing stones is only one way to make points (and not necessarily a good one), it is a fallacy to think that a balanced game between opponents will lead to an equal number of captured stones. Sacrificing a large number of stones CAN be (but again, not necessarily) a good way to win with a large and solid territory.

But, maybe I've misunderstood you.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #67 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:22 pm 
Lives in sente

Posts: 946
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 41
Rank: IGS 5kyu
KGS: KoDream
IGS: SmoothOper
Marcus wrote:
SmoothOper wrote:
I seldom capture as many stones as my opponent and sometimes they capture very many, even when I win, which I think is a defect, that I am trying to improve, though it is kind of odd to me that at my rank playing other people at my same rank winning marginally greater than 50% something like this would occur.


This does not seem to be a defect. Maybe I've misunderstood what you mean, but it sounds like you think that winning while not capturing as many stones as your opponent does is a problem, and that you should be capturing at least as many stones as your opponent. Is this what you meant? Because if so I think you may have a fundamental misunderstanding of the game.

Because capturing stones is only one way to make points (and not necessarily a good one), it is a fallacy to think that a balanced game between opponents will lead to an equal number of captured stones. Sacrificing a large number of stones CAN be (but again, not necessarily) a good way to win with a large and solid territory.

But, maybe I've misunderstood you.


It just seems like my play would be more efficient if fewer of my stones were captured. IE I could do essentially the same thing in fewer over all moves.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #68 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:29 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 460
Liked others: 149
Was liked: 101
Rank: 3 kyu
Universal go server handle: billywoods
SmoothOper wrote:
It just seems like my play would be more efficient if fewer of my stones were captured. IE I could do essentially the same thing in fewer over all moves.

Have you ever seen a professional game in which one player deliberately throws a handful of stones into their opponent's territory and then lets them get captured almost immediately? There are many important tesuji that involve stone sacrifice. (A very simple example is throw-ins to reduce liberties.)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #69 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:42 pm 
Lives in sente

Posts: 946
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 41
Rank: IGS 5kyu
KGS: KoDream
IGS: SmoothOper
billywoods wrote:
SmoothOper wrote:
It just seems like my play would be more efficient if fewer of my stones were captured. IE I could do essentially the same thing in fewer over all moves.

Have you ever seen a professional game in which one player deliberately throws a handful of stones into their opponent's territory and then lets them get captured almost immediately? There are many important tesuji that involve stone sacrifice. (A very simple example is throw-ins to reduce liberties.)


Well, sure there is a time an a place for sacrifice, but I seem to do it more often others.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #70 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:44 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2777
Location: Seattle, WA
Liked others: 251
Was liked: 549
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
SmoothOper wrote:
Well, sure there is a time an a place for sacrifice, but I seem to do it more often others.


In a current DGS game, I just had an opponent save two of his stones I had in atari when there were more than 4 point endgame moves left on the board. I could have captured more stones, but I'd rather have more points than captures.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #71 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:02 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 370
Liked others: 91
Was liked: 254
Rank: Weak
Since this discussion has long since been derailed: An example of when getting a large group captured is an essential part of a whole board strategy for winning.


This post by lemmata was liked by: Twitchy Go
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #72 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:37 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1449
Liked others: 1562
Was liked: 140
Rank: KGS 6k
GD Posts: 892
While discussion seems to already be on another subject, I don't think anyone mentioned this:
billywoods wrote:
SmoothOper wrote:
reading is superior to strategy

That is not what anyone has said. Reading is a tool to help you put your strategy into action. It is also the only tool.
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.

_________________
a1h1 [1d]: You just need to curse the gods and defend.
Good Go = Shape.
Associação Portuguesa de Go

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #73 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:39 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 460
Liked others: 149
Was liked: 101
Rank: 3 kyu
Universal go server handle: billywoods
Phelan wrote:
While discussion seems to already be on another subject, I don't think anyone mentioned this:
billywoods wrote:
SmoothOper wrote:
reading is superior to strategy

That is not what anyone has said. Reading is a tool to help you put your strategy into action. It is also the only tool.
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.

Perhaps I was unclear. I'm not advocating reading out everything in a position (because most amateurs just can't, and because sometimes reading 2 moves ahead is enough to know you've achieved your goal), and I'm not saying that all reading must be done during the game if you're able to use other shapes you already know to simplify the process. I'm also not denying the use of playing shapes (or joseki, or tesuji...) that someone else has read out and you only have a primitive understanding of, because again there's only so much you can do. But there must be some reading somewhere - it's just that, when you have a strong pattern recognition ability, this reading gets heavily deferred. You can't just shape randomly over the board, or make it your mission to always hane at the head of two or three without checking whether it's good, because you'll get sliced to bits.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #74 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:43 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 946
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 41
Rank: IGS 5kyu
KGS: KoDream
IGS: SmoothOper
Phelan wrote:
While discussion seems to already be on another subject, I don't think anyone mentioned this:
billywoods wrote:
SmoothOper wrote:
reading is superior to strategy

That is not what anyone has said. Reading is a tool to help you put your strategy into action. It is also the only tool.
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.


This is an interesting perspective. I have definitely played a person who I felt had better shape than me, very interesting game and very close at the end despite so much tenuki. It made me think all these people who talk about influence are just another variant on the greedy approach, compared to that. Very interesting maybe even cosmic.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #75 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:24 am 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Phelan wrote:
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.


FWIW, I disagree with this ;) In my experience, good shape is invaluable, but never a replacement for reading. What it does make is an excellent reading assistance tool, giving you quick access to good moves to start with in reading out lines.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #76 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:32 am 
Oza

Posts: 2495
Location: DC
Liked others: 157
Was liked: 443
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
topazg wrote:
Phelan wrote:
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.


FWIW, I disagree with this ;) In my experience, good shape is invaluable, but never a replacement for reading. What it does make is an excellent reading assistance tool, giving you quick access to good moves to start with in reading out lines.


To follow up on this, good shape is only good shape if it's deployed in the right circumstances. Putting a bamboo joint or table shape in a situation with nothing around it is probably quite inefficient, to take an extreme example.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #77 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:01 pm 
Lives in sente

Posts: 946
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 41
Rank: IGS 5kyu
KGS: KoDream
IGS: SmoothOper
topazg wrote:
Phelan wrote:
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.


FWIW, I disagree with this ;) In my experience, good shape is invaluable, but never a replacement for reading. What it does make is an excellent reading assistance tool, giving you quick access to good moves to start with in reading out lines.



topazg, the moderator that isn't moderate.


skydyr wrote:
To follow up on this, good shape is only good shape if it's deployed in the right circumstances. Putting a bamboo joint or table shape in a situation with nothing around it is probably quite inefficient, to take an extreme example.


I'm not for certain how people with good shape operate, but it seems like there is more to shape than tables and bamboo joints.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #78 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:06 pm 
Dies in gote
User avatar

Posts: 40
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 5
Rank: KGS 13-kyu
KGS: hirohiigo
I've read this whole thread and I have no idea what's actually being discussed.

It's not possible to play any game without a strategy because your strategy is your goal in the game. Even if you just make random moves, that's a "spray and pray" strategy.

_________________
Image


This post by hirohiigo was liked by: Phelan
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #79 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:03 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1449
Liked others: 1562
Was liked: 140
Rank: KGS 6k
GD Posts: 892
topazg wrote:
Phelan wrote:
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.


FWIW, I disagree with this ;) In my experience, good shape is invaluable, but never a replacement for reading. What it does make is an excellent reading assistance tool, giving you quick access to good moves to start with in reading out lines.

Please note that I said "another tool", not "the only tool", unlike billywoods, who I was disagreeing with.
I never said it was a replacement.

_________________
a1h1 [1d]: You just need to curse the gods and defend.
Good Go = Shape.
Associação Portuguesa de Go

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Is it possible to play Go without strategy?
Post #80 Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:17 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1449
Liked others: 1562
Was liked: 140
Rank: KGS 6k
GD Posts: 892
billywoods wrote:
Phelan wrote:
While discussion seems to already be on another subject, I don't think anyone mentioned this:
billywoods wrote:
That is not what anyone has said. Reading is a tool to help you put your strategy into action. It is also the only tool.
I disagree with this. Pattern matching is another tool. If you recognize good shape, you might not need to read. Memorisation and recall(of joseki, openings, etc) is another tool. There are likely others I'm not thinking of right now.

Perhaps I was unclear. I'm not advocating reading out everything in a position (because most amateurs just can't, and because sometimes reading 2 moves ahead is enough to know you've achieved your goal), and I'm not saying that all reading must be done during the game if you're able to use other shapes you already know to simplify the process. I'm also not denying the use of playing shapes (or joseki, or tesuji...) that someone else has read out and you only have a primitive understanding of, because again there's only so much you can do. But there must be some reading somewhere - it's just that, when you have a strong pattern recognition ability, this reading gets heavily deferred.
Then you're interpreting everything as being "reading". I think that's as silly as saying that everything is strategy.
Joseki is reading, because professionals have read it over and over for us?
I would classify joseki as knowledge, and would classify reading as what you do to see if the corner cases or deviations are better in this particular situation.
billywoods wrote:
You can't just shape randomly over the board, or make it your mission to always hane at the head of two or three without checking whether it's good, because you'll get sliced to bits.
You can pretty much play honte and shape moves all around using pattern recognition, or intuition(*starts counting down till Robert appears* :p), it just won't work unless you have perfect(or very good) pattern recognition/intuition. That's why I specifically said: "another tool"
I won't deny that reading is the base for everything else, and a tool that can take you much further than the rest, but I won't accept that it's the only tool.

_________________
a1h1 [1d]: You just need to curse the gods and defend.
Good Go = Shape.
Associação Portuguesa de Go

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group