I am not asking if you can count a game, I am asking if you do.

As most of you will know, I wrote what has become a very popular set of lessons on how to count. But I almost never count a game. Sure I know how to, and if I think a game is very close I can count it down to the last half point. But these days it all seems like too much effort. I play for fun and just about never think for more than 5 seconds on a more, even on DGS. If my intuition is not enough to win a game then I don't worry myself about it.

Of course, this is one reason I have not improved in twenty years.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

I'm trying to learn at the moment. So I do, but I'm not so sure that I can.

Only 9x9 games so far. In other sizes I mostly estimate visually. I very rarely count on larger boards.

_________________
a1h1 [1d]: You just need to curse the gods and defend.
Good Go = Shape.
Associação Portuguesa de Go

I do, and I do often. Your lessons got me started, and some other stuff I read about counting convinced me. I count around the middle game, and use my counts to determine whether I should play aggressive or solid from that point on.

_________________
My blog about Macs and more: Kirkville

I do, and do often as well. Everytime I don't I hear Kageyama shouting at me

In most games I don't. In tournaments I try to, but often get caught up in the play and forget.

I want to do it more, it's a patience issue more than anything else... I usually want to spend my time finding the best moves, not necessarily assessing the state of the game.

I worry about getting too passive though, if I read the game as me ahead by X points, It's sometimes dangerous to say "well, I'm ahead here, so I can play safe"

_________________
Tactics yes, Tact no...

Could you elaborate about the "other stuff"?

Mic

_________________
Go is easy: don't play bad moves.

I don't recall where I read other things about counting, but certainly in a couple of books. Topazg says Kageyama, so I probably read it in one of his books.

_________________
My blog about Macs and more: Kirkville

I went through Dr. Straw's counting lessons - http://senseis.xmp.net/?SteveFawthrop%2FCounting - for those who may be interested - when I was a ddk, and found it too difficult to distinguish between probable and possible territory (definite, while easier, often turned out wrong). I've tried to do it while watching other peoples games, but during my own games I've never come close to making an accurate count.

The main reason that I don't count though, is because I don't think I'mgood enough to alter my strategy to suit the situation. Basically, I just try to do my best the whole game.

_________________
Patience, grasshopper.

i only count on close game.
when i am winning by more than 10 pts i can usually feel that i am winning by enough margin so i usually dont count.

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"
Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson

That's a really useful link, I'm going to try some of those counting strategies. Thanks DrStraw for doing this in the first place.

_________________
Tactics yes, Tact no...

I rarely count in casual internet games, I do more often in serious games with longer time limits (german league, I used to in turn based games)

usually I don't count but make a rough estimate that is usually pretty close.
occasionally when I play a tournament game and I feel it's quite close I count to see if I really need to go all out or if I can play "that extra defensive move just to be sure"

_________________
Laurens
Go school: freegame's Teaching School
Author of: The Next Move a book for 15-3kyu players.

You mean you have only just discovered them! Those were done eight years ago and I haven't even looked as most of them since then.

_________________
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).

I wholeheartedly counted twice in my so far Go-career. Both times, I got way off (one time I even resigned because I think, I got destroyed but could have won).

So, the answer is, since then I didn't counted once. (To answer the indirect question, it seems I can't count anyway : D)

_________________
My "guide" to become stronger in Go

I counted in both games I played last night, but I usually don't. But I have a hard time keeping track of what I counted in my head, because I'm not used to it. So each time I counted I had to start over from the beginning, e.g. "Was the big area on the bottom 35 points or 45 points?" Unfortunately, I lost one of the games because I got time short and felt rushed; the score was close enough that I might have won if I wasn't time pressured.

My estimating is not very good and my counting is not much better, and it's slow. Which is why I'm trying to do it more. But at the speed I usually play (automatch medium), it seems like it's only borderline worth it.

The other day I played a game and I thought I was behind by about 10, maybe less, so I figured it was worth playing through endgame. I lost by more than 30 and was embarrassed for not resigning. So I resolved to learn to count to avoid that kind of situation.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Lately my games tend to hinge on a large group dying, so counting is pretty much impossible until well out of the middle game. But once the status of everything is determined, I count. I've gotten much better and faster, I'm usually within five points. Basically I count so I know if I should resign or not. If playing with a clock, I count before going into overtime.

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Indeed, crazy it is, but an accurate, quick count of the game is not my strong suit.
I haven't gone through them all yet, and I imagine I do some of the stuff, but having a good method for counting, rather than ("how do I feel like counting this game today") goes a long way toward speeding up and increasing the accuracy of the count.

_________________
Tactics yes, Tact no...

There are, afaik, specifically only 2 instances when I don't count:
1. When I'm in byoyomi; too hard to count in overtime. However, if I'm down by more than 20 it's usually easy enough to tell.
2. When I feel it looks "close enough" and simply try to play the best endgame that I can. Definition of close enough is related to the latter sentence in 1.

Actually, now that I think about it, counting may have gotten me in trouble in BOTH of my games last night. In the second game, I judged my opponent to be much weaker both because I was able to push him around, but also because I had a count that showed me way ahead. I started getting lazy and let him almost catch up. I ended up killing a big group because he messed up, and still probably would have won by 10 or so even if I hadn't, but I shouldn't have let it get that close.

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku